Once again the tools at Conservapædia succeed in demeaning women. Can we have a round of applause for the immense stupidity, insensitivity and sexism of this group of social conservatives?
What will draw more women to atheism? PONIES! Yep, that's right. Not focus on educating more women, not rational discourse, the way forth is ponies.
As per usual, they also aim slurs against gorgeous, intelligent, rational people such as Stephen Fry (who they forgot to mention doesn't get on well with horses and is a rabid homosexual so clearly repels woman such that he has to be with men - shame on them) and PZ Myers because they are or have been overweight. You know someone is losing an argument when they create a whole wikia page devoted to pointing out that some people on the other side are fat. Or that they've been married a few times, because no conservatives have cheated on their partners or been married multiple times. The patronising tone makes me want to throw bricks though walls.
"Perhaps, if atheist Richard Dawkins was nicer, less abrasive and understood women better, he would still be with his first wife and not be on his third wife! Women appear to love ponies more than they love Richard Dawkins!"
I should add, they overuse exclamation marks horrendously.
(via Blag Hag)